30503RE: RE: RE: Separating internal traffic to a new profile in Google analytics
- Sep 19, 2013
(Read my answer on the site, not by email, some of the code is broken on the email)
--- In email@example.com, <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Hi Sid, try this tool:
Or, if it the tool does not solve your problem, another approach is creating 2 or more filters like this:
#1) Include only: ^123\.123\.
#2) Include only: \.(34\.56|78\.90)$
So, it will allow:
--- In email@example.com, <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Hi Andre,
Thanks for pointing this out but I tried to do this as you've recommended but I've a few long IP address ranges and IP address field can only take at most 255 characters.
Any workaround for this?
--- In email@example.com, <andremafeib@...> wrote:
Are you using 2 include filters together? If so, that's the problem. Because visits from the IP X will pas by the first filter (include only ip X), but will be blocked by the second filter (include only IP Y). You need to use just one filter with regex. For example, to include only visits from 126.96.36.199 or 188.8.131.52, create the filter:
Filter Field = Ip Address
Filter Pattern = 1\.1\.1\.1|2\.2\.2\.2
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, <syedspiky@...> wrote:Hi Andre,
It isn't working unfortunately. I can't include a screenshot here so the filter is like this:
Rank Filter name Filter type
1 RF internal LAN IPs include Include
2 RF Internal wireless IPs include include
--- In email@example.com, <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Hi, this should work. The problem is probably in the Filter configuration. Can you share a print-screen or more details?
--- In email@example.com, <syedspiky@...> wrote:
> Hi experts, I was wondering if I can only Include the traffic from my organisation to a website and then see only this traffic in a separate profile in Google analytics. I've created an IP address Include filter but don't see any traffic in this profile even if I visit this website from my organisation's PCs. Am I missing anything here? Many thanks, Sid
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>