Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

19959Re: Why do we still need Omniture?

Expand Messages
  • Andrew Edwards
    Nov 3, 2008
      Obviously a great question judging by the number of responses.

      Putting the question to use involves asking it a little differently.
      For instance, "What are my requirements and which products can help me
      meet them?"

      Some key things to consider:

      -is cost not just a factor, but the biggest or only factor?
      -is robust vendor support required?
      -how much customization do I need?
      -how much data do I need to pull from analytics for integration with
      other systems?
      -would I rather run analytics software internally?
      -how much is invested in the current solution?
      -is there a potential benefit in running parallel reporting environments?

      Google regularly releases improved versions of its products. The rest
      of the field will be spurred to do the same. Presumably the customer
      will benefit--having made the right choice for their organization.

      --Andrew Edwards
      Technology Leaders

      ---- In webanalytics@yahoogroups.com, "alexbrasil489" <alexbrasil@...>
      > As far as I see it, this debate usually gets derailed by zealots on
      > one side or the other making an absolute statement that is almost
      > assuredly garbage. The one that rankles me the most is
      > "GA is for toying around. Get other tools when you want to get
      > I personally find that statement rather offensive, even though in my
      > current position I don't use GA, it is a solid tool that is improving
      > by leaps and bounds, and, for a ton of companies, is a great way to
      > start optimizing their websites right now.
      > Having said that, for large corporations with very complex needs and
      > resources to spare, it is NOT at Omniture's level. If you've even
      > been briefly exposed to Discover, Data Warehouse, or even HBX report
      > builder (I'll lump that in with Omniture for now), etc, you will
      > easily be persuaded that the tools, at a very high level, have
      > features that GA lacks, or, features that GA has but that are more
      > refined.
      > Michael Feiner's post in this thread is so bang on that it should be
      > re-read multiple times. Right tool for the right job should be the
      > real impetus here, not veiled.. dare I say, member measuring contests
      > between tools (no pun intended). To argue his point forward, where I
      > work we have 4 dedicated web analysts (more than most that I know of),
      > and we're so overwhelmed with everything involved in a migration,
      > proper implementation and the like that, I hate to say it, our current
      > usage of our WA tool is way less than ideal. A number of those issues
      > are being worked out, and I suspect that as we fix a few
      > organizational matters that the analytics portion of the business will
      > only improve, but it makes one point rather clear.
      > This is a big company, with a dedicated web analytics team, an
      > expensive tool and, I'd like to think, some pretty bright people all
      > focused on analyzing the data that the many sites produce (in addition
      > to our survey tools and other items of data collection). A small
      > company could not afford this type of expenditure-- and if the 4 of us
      > can barely handle what we have right now, imagine how some lone
      > analyst would feel? What would happen if said analyst had Omniture?
      > He or she would waste the money on any sizable project, or they're a
      > fricken super hero.
      > The needs of the company and the resources available will dictate
      > whether someone needs Omniture or not-- right now, the two tools play
      > in different spaces though they can drive one or another to be better.
      > It's not even an issue of low end or high end, it's one of need and
      > fit.
      > --- In webanalytics@yahoogroups.com, "Gerry" <dergal@> wrote:
      > >
      > > --- In webanalytics@yahoogroups.com, "londonturu" <londonturu@>
      > > wrote:
      > > >
      > >
      > > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/webanalytics/message/19938)
      > > >
      > > > -------Brian Clifton's answer------------
      > > > Loren - your points are inaccurate and do not reflect the reality
      > > >
      > > > >>3. Customization - You get what you get with Google, but many
      > > > >> sophisticated digital marketers have unique needs, not just slice
      > > > >>and dice requirements.
      > > >
      > > > The latest info on customisation is here:
      > > > http://analytics.blogspot.com/ Essentially
      > > > the new custom reporting was annouced at eMetrics in DC
      > >
      > >
      > > Not everyone has got that yet, I certainly haven't! Significantly,
      > > will it allow you to pivot everything on everything? I didn't think
      > > that it did ... ?
      > >
      > > > >>4. Open access to all data, for true data integration
      > > >
      > > > The latest info on the GA API is here:
      > > http://analytics.blogspot.com/
      > > > Essentially the new API feature was annouced at eMetrics in DC.
      > > > Google has a very open policy about data access. Hence other vendors
      > > > use Google's APIs to pull Adwords data on behalf of clients. Its a
      > > > pity that Yahoo and MS adCentre are not as open. After all it is the
      > > > end-clients data!
      > >
      > >
      > > Can you act on this data? I.e. target the site specificallly in the
      > > same way you can with Omniture etc.. using this data? obviously it
      > > may require some development, but can you use this data?
      > >
      > >
      > > > >> >6. Multi-domain or cross-domain tracking
      > > >
      > > > >> No problem with this - others have post the Help Centre articles
      > > > that show you how to do this
      > >
      > >
      > > Hey, not wanting to argue (truly) but this is a requirement we have a
      > > lot of the time - i.e. where the client owns three domains, traffic
      > > often ends up going between all three - without setting up special
      > > links (they can get to them independantly without following links)
      > > and without them being on the same domain (i.e. different subdomains)
      > > can you do this? As I say, this is the one feature that we have that
      > > we struggle to use GA for, everything else is manageable.
      > >
      > >
      > > >
      > > > >>7. First party cookie. Google gets blocked out of the box on IE8,
      > > > >> Chrome, Firefox and increasingly by users with spyware, etc who
      > > >>
      > > > avoid pop up ads, spyware,
      > >
      > > Disclaimer: I do work for an online agency who is partnered with
      > > Omniture, CoreMetrics and WebTrends - however I am a fan of Google
      > > Analytics, and often find that I resort to it even when other tools
      > > are installed... & I also have a copy of Dr Cliitons Book either on
      > > my desk or on a colleagues when he has stolen it off me...
      > >
      > > Gerry
      > >
    • Show all 34 messages in this topic