Re: FW: [wccusdtalk] Corrections to Margaret's post
Jason consistently speaks about IDEA Academy, of which he should be rightly proud. HE HIDES NOTHING, so please listen! IDEA started serving a very poor Latino community (90% low income) where students were being failed by the local public schools. Now 98% of the student graduating IDEA are now college ready. Whatever they did, shouldn't we look into it?
You miss Jason's primary message. Elements that make charters high performing could be incorporated into non-charter WCCUSD schools. This is why he believes so strongly in school site empowerment. You can't argue with the results. It's this idea that attracted me to his campaign in the first place.
As far as those who gave Jason money, make what you want of these donations. According to David Brooks, it doesn't matter. Mr. Jungherr contributed to another candidate, yet you refrain from drawing conclusions about anyone but Jason. Campaign donors above $100 are required to report their job title and employer. We followed the law and obtained this information. If you don't agree with how the donors represented themselves, the issue is between you and them.
Margaret, not everything is a conspiracy. If it were, I'd say we have a vast conspiracy right now in this district to deny our children their full potential and the right to an education. We conspire by accepting that this is the best we can do. We've had a decade of dis-empowering teachers, ignoring cries of concern about the failing curriculum, obtuse administration and imposed solutions. When a candidate openly vows to address this, teacher advocates go on the attack? This seems a real conspiracy, or just plain folly.
We need to own that we, the adult community, are rendering these schools dysfunctional. No matter who gets on the board, it's time to halt dysfunction, challenge all standing assumptions and turn this place upside down to save this generation of kids. We are continually self-limiting by habit at this point. The district exists to serve the students interests, not the other way around.
Treasurer, Freeman for School Board 2010
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Tony Sustak & Margaret G. Browne" <mtsustak@...> wrote:
> Jason Freeman was part of the founding team of the IDEA Academy, now the
> IDEA public school system (source Waterfront Watch, Jason Freeman Press
> Release). The IDEA Academy was a charter school and the IDEA public school
> system is an independently managed charter school system (Wikipedia IDEA
> Public Schools). Jason is not transparent when he says that WCCUSD doesn't
> need charters to improve our schools, but does not reveal his charter
> association on his website or in public forums. If he is genuinely against
> charters, why doesn't he reveal his charter involvement and state why, based
> on his experience, charters are not the solution for WCCUSD? According to
> the Recipients Campaign Statement, Schedule A Monetary Contributions
> Received for Jason Freeman, WCCUSD School Board candidate filed at the
> Contra Costa County Election Department, Gail Mendes and Anton Jungherr have
> contributed to Freeman's campaign. Significance? Mendes is a past UTR
> President, now CTA Secretary Treasurer, and candidate for CTA Vice
> President; Jungherr is Business Manager of Making Waves Academy, a charter
> school in WCCUSD. Mendes deceptively identified herself as Teacher, WCCUSD
> on the recipients document. Mendes is an aggressive advocate for WCCUSD
> becoming a charter school district. I'm sure that she and Jungherr
> contributed to Freeman's campaign because of his charter history and that ,
> at least, he would be open and friendly to their interests (charter schools)
> if elected to the Board.
> Margaret Browne
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On
> Behalf Of Todd Groves
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 12:13 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: [wccusdtalk] Corrections to Margaret's post
> It's up to the moderator to determine the appropriateness of the post.
> I'm going to follow Chris Slamon's lead. If it's OK to trash a candidate,
> then it's OK to debunk BS about one. Margaret Browne's post about Jason
> Freeman doesn't reflect the candidate's real positions, of which I've become
> well acquainted. We shouldn't use this list to propagate rumor, so I'm going
> to address the allegations one by one.
> I don't know how Jason's stated agenda of empowering teachers and school
> leaders can be construed as either anti-teacher or privatization. Allowing
> more flexibility at the site level would seem to give teachers more freedom
> to meet their students' needs. You can debate its merits or attainability,
> but not the fact this is his outspoken agenda.
> If he is a stealth candidate with a hidden agenda, what sinister plot is he
> unleashing on WCCUSD? Low performing schools and a fleeing student base? Too
> late, we already have those. Perhaps a Wal-Mart on every campus?
> As for "all about privatization," he states over and over that he doesn't
> support it. He has said that WCCUSD doesn't need charters to improve our
> schools. He rejects charters as a broad solution at every instance the
> subject arises, so again he is being mischaracterized. The candidate forums
> are online. Watch them yourself and listen to his answer to the charter
> In his early 20's, he did help start a charter school to serve very poor
> children in south Texas (This is laudable. What I did in my early 20's, I
> couldn't post here). The school transformed the lives of many students, and
> is now ranked in #13 in US News list of top high schools nationwide. We
> wouldn't want this happening in WCCUSD, would we?
> Regarding the Race to the Top, the poster "assumes" the worst possible
> interpretation of Jason's actions. The data systems section had only the
> goal of improving California's data systems, not linking it to teacher pay,
> but instead changing our reliance on simplistic tests as our only measure of
> student success. We often complain about the incompleteness if not
> uselessness of our current data sets. Do we keep the ones we have, or try to
> improve them?
> If you want to see his nefarious plot, read it yourself,
> http://www.caracetothetop.org . Jason did the grantwriting for Section D and
> the STEM section. The priorities in this proposal were created by the seven
> school districts that led the proposal. WCCUSD signed on late and was not
> involved in setting priorities for the state.
> My last post stands corrected. Jason did answer a question about merit pay
> at the El Cerrito Democratic Club, in which he said we have no accurate way
> to assess teachers for that purpose. This is the similar to the position of
> the American Federation of Teachers.
> Much of the mischaracterizations of Jason were posted as "Candidate
> Statements" in the UTR website, which the candidates DID NOT WRITE. UTR
> wrote those statements, emphasizing whatever they wanted to portray about
> each candidate. To be either fair or accurate, it should be stated as such.
> We have enough substantial issues in this race to avoid plastering the
> candidates with falsehoods. You can take them at their word or not, but you
> shouldn't invent positions for them. We should be using this forum to fully
> investigate issues and candidates, not spread bunk.
> Todd Groves
> Treasurer, Freeman for School Board 2010, and this time it's pertinent.
> Contact Jason yourself if you want to know where he stands,
> www.jasonfreeman.org. The same goes for the other candidates; and they are
> http://www.cowens.net/campaign/index.php http://charlesramsey.net/
> http://madelinekronenberg.net/index.html http://www.audreymiles.webs.com I
> can't find a website for Elaine Merriweather. Please post it if you have it.
> These are all well-intended people, agree with them or not.
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]