Dear Wayland Voter,
Parents of Loker School students are angry about the School
Committee's vote to close part of the school and use the rest for
all of Wayland's kindergartners. They have issued extensive
research and mounted a campaign by phone and email to
rescind the decision and study options again.
The furor has even produced a write-in candidate who argues
that the School Committee has shown itself incompetent to
make decisions in a studied, rational way.
"The School Committee seems ill-equipped to make difficult
decisions," says Jeffrey Baron, who seeks one of two contested
Committee seats on the April ballot. Though Baron's daughter is
in kindergarten at Loker, he says he is not arguing against the
closure per se, but rather against slipshod decision-making.
"Rather than relying on facts, figures and hard data to support a
decision on which school to close, " Baron says, "they have
instead relied on hunches, feelings, incomplete data sets and
politically-motivated recommendations by school
There was no serious research of traffic or anything else
comparing Happy Hollow and Loker as kindergarten sites,
Baron said in a WVN interview: "not a dime...not a moment."
Loker parents paid for a traffic study by Michael Abend, who has
consulted for Wayland in the past. Abend concluded that Happy
Hollow would be a better kindergarten location because of its
more central location and inherent traffic limitations.
Parents also produced a 29-page analysis arguing that Loker
has more capacity, a better cafeteria, more parking and larger
grounds. Loker also represents the better long-term fiscal
choice should the town shut one facility entirely because of
dropping enrollment, the study asserted. The parents also
dispute school administration estimates of revenue from renting
unused Loker space.
Among those who follow school administration and School
Committee actions there has been the general impression that
Happy Hollow would remain open, at least in the near term.
School Committee decisions as far back as 2005 helped to
create that impression.
In November 2005 Superintendent Gary Burton presented two
scenarios should an expected property tax override fail: 1) Close
Happy Hollow; 2) Retain Happy Hollow by eliminating many
Middle and High School programs, including all athletics.
Concerned Happy Hollow parents commented at length.
When the School Committee then met on Nov. 28, it decided to
spare Happy Hollow. The override passed in 2006, rendering the
At the annual Town Meeting on April 29, 2007, Steven Glovsky
(now a candidate for the School Committee) moved to cut
$735,000 in Happy Hollow repairs from the capital budget
because of a belief that the school would be closed in case of
downsizing. School Committee member Jeff Dieffenbach told
voters, "We're probably at least three to five years away from
having to make a closure due to enrollment needs."
Selectman Alan Reiss said, "...my understanding is that we had
a verbal understanding that Happy Hollow would not be that
one...If there is any disagreement with that, please let me know."
No town official responded, and the $735,000 remained in the
The 2007 commitment to major repairs (still not completed)
solidified the sense that the school would remain open.
In November 2007 the School Committee initially rejected
reconfiguring the schools unless an override failed.
Superintendent Burton appointed an ad hoc committee to study
possible school reconfiguration because of override failure or in
the longer term. Loker parents say they were expecting a
long-term study. But, after the ad hoc group had twice met briefly,
the School Committee on Jan. 15 suddenly announced its
"2-1/2 school" plan to reduce a budget shortfall that threatened
some athletic programs. On Jan. 28 the Committee voted to
adopt the plan but put off a decision on which school should be
"halved." After an outcry, the Committee put off final action until
the public could be heard. The decisive vote came on Feb. 25.
The Committee's plan is expected to save about $300,000,
mostly in personnel costs. The saving was part of Finance
Committee revisions reducing the requested April 2008 override
from $2.6 million to $1.9 million.
Superintendent Burton says Happy Hollow is "a structurally
sounder building" with a better floor plan for its intended purpose
than Loker's. Facilities manager John Moynihan estimates
saving about $13,000 annually in utility costs if Loker is used
only for kindergarten.
Baron, a Wayland resident since 1999 and a financial consultant
with an MBA from Cornell University, says his experience with a
multinational consulting firm gives him skills in research and
financial analysis that the School Committee needs.
The candidates on the April 8 ballot are Glovsky and incumbents
Barbara Fletcher and Louis Jurist.
You can read more about Baron at www.jeffreysbaron.com.
Incumbent Jeff Dieffenbach writes about the controversy at
-- Michael Short
SCHOOL COMMITTEE MEETING
The School Committee will meet at 7:30 p.m. on Monday March
10 (second floor, town building) "to address several additional
thoughts that have been raised by the community." The
announcement was issued on March 5.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENT DEADLINE
Comments on the Wayland Town Center Final Environmental
Impact Report are due at the Massachusetts Environmental
Policy Act office by March 21. The mixed-use project developers
withdrew an earlier final report. The revised plan can be found at
the Wayland Library.
To be sure you continue to receive WVN newsletters optimally
and in your inbox (instead of bulk or junk folders) it may help to
add to your address book or safe sender list:
Thank you for reading this WVN newsletter. Please forward it to
your friends and neighbors in Wayland. If they want to receive
their own copy, they can send an email to
and they will be signed up for the
listserv. Or, they can sign themselves up by sending a blank
Click reply and send after receiving an e-mail confirming the
Wayland Voters Network
Michael Short, Editor