Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

302WVN #267: Voters reject money articles

Expand Messages
  • waylandvoters1
    Nov 17, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      Dear Wayland Voter,

      Special Town meeting voters said No to two measures involving money but showed unquestioning support for voter-sponsored articles  involving long-range planning and environmentally sound and customer- friendly use of the landfill.

       Article 12 on the Nov. 12 warrant  -- to borrow $650,000 for automated water meter reading -- was  backed by the watecommissioners, the Board of Selectmen and the Finance Committee.   

      Voters asked probing questions about the sketchily outlined plan, and  ultimately the measure failed to draw the required two-thirds majority.

      The water commissioners' idea was to install electronic devices on all water meters so the town could read the meters remotely and send bills  every month instead of every six months. 

      Wayland's Water Department is  operating under a consent decree and is under pressure from the state  Department of Environmental Protection to reduce average per capita use. In the past couple of years usage has hovered  between 80 and 95
      gallons  per person per day; the state standard  65.

      The theory is that monthly billing  would encourage householders to realize how much water is wasted in residential system leaks and used for lawn  watering.  

      The measure was presented as revenue-neutral even though the town would pay off the debt over 10 years, including interest of up to $120,000. The proposal assumed that less manpower would be needed and  the town would no longer have to
      forgive certain payments because of long-undetected leaks.

      Voters questioned the financial assumptions and analysis. What about  the extra $18,000 in annual postage? Why not draw on the commissioners' reserve fund of more than $1 million? If the goal is to reduce water usage, why not regulate it? Given
      Wayland's  history of project prices creeping upward, will $650,000 really do the job?  What will the interest rate be?  The Town has not borrowed since las January, when the interest rate was 4%.   

      Voters may be skittish about taking on new debt during the greatest  international financial crisis since the 1930s. In any case, they   found officials' responses to questions unpersuasive.

       TAX DELINQUENCY

      The only other negative vote came on Article 8, to increase the charge  when the treasurer sends tax delinquency notices. It wasn't the amount  of money that was controversial, but rather a principle.

      The Board of Selectmen asked for an increase from $5 to $30. As with the water meter article, officials seemed unprepared for questions and  had to consult  others before answering.

      One voter's question resulted in the disclosure that the town sends  delinquency notices "almost daily."

      A voter rose to oppose the article, saying that people who can afford  to pay taxes on time presumably do so, and that an increased charge discriminates against those who are already in difficulty.

      The town shouldn't be expected to make a profit on such fees because  "the town is here to serve the people," he said.

      Another voter noted that the measure has a disproportionate effect:   A resident might owe an excise tax of, say, $25 and be hit with a penalty of $30.

      In the only counted vote of the evening, the measure failed, 105-73.

      TRASH DISPOSAL COSTS

      Voters approved Article 11, which transfers $188,000 from unappropriated funds to make up a budget shortfall for the landfill (now   transfer station), but there was considerable discussion and    skepticism.

      Knowing that the landfill would reach capacity last summer and the  town for the first time would be forced to pay to have waste hauled   away, the Board of Health raised the annual sticker price more than 30 percent to $320. At the higher price,
      fewer stickers were sold than previously, and extra money is needed to cover the $272,500 disposal contract with  Waste Management Corp.

      Some voters wondered whether they should in effect reward poor planning.

      What happens if we vote No, one asked. Do we default on the contract with Waste Management? Answer from the Board of Health: We reduce the operating budget and transfer less waste. That answer raises further questions, which weren't pursued.

      One voter wanted to know whether the senior discount would end in the next fiscal year  as had been suggested in a Memo. Answer: There is no plan to do that.

      Underlying the discussion was the fact that Wayland rates are among the highest in the state. Some towns subsidize waste disposal as a service considered beneficial to the entire town. Wayland relies on users, including the schools, Housing
      Authority and town buildings to cover costs. Current financial results, even though the   transfer station has fewer employees than an active landfill,    suggest that more work needs to be done to create a viable system.

      For the rest of the articles, though, it was generally smooth sailing.

      PLANNING

       Under Article  18, a temporary  11-member committee appointed by the  town moderator and eight boards and committees will take a fresh look at the Master Plan, which the Planning Board   accepted four  years ago.

      The genesis of the petitioners' article was dismay in the Pinebrook  neighborhood over a shopping mall proposed for the 10-acre site of the defunct Lee's Farm Market, across from Luigi's Restaurant on Route 20, and in  Cochituate at the prospect
      of an imposing cookie-cutter CVS replacing several small businesses.

      Petitioners argued that other towns have shown that property values are maintained when there is rational, pro-active planning rather than simply reacting to every proposal  that comes before the town.

       Let's stop "the slow creep of divisive surprises," said one petitioner.

      TRASH DISPOSAL  AND COMPOSTING

      Article 1  is a resolution prodding  the Board of Health to create a  pay-as-you-throw  system for  trash disposal at the landfill, now a transfer station for waste being trucked trucked to an incinerator.

      The Board, which   had been criticized for moving too slowly,  supports the idea. The Board will hold an informational meeting on  Dec. 9 at 7:30 p.m.

      The resolution also recommends home composting, which the Department  of Environmental Protection estimates can reduce the amount of waste  to be removed by up to 24 percent.

      For information on composting and inexpensive composters, see  http://www.mass.gov/dep/recycle/reduce/composti.htm%c2%a0

      OTHER ARTICLES

       2. Allows Wayland to match the state's $900 property tax break for  some seniors.

      3. Transfers landfill employees, property (exclusive of the land) and funds to the Department  of Public Works when it is created next year.

      4. Authorizes easements on town-owned land  for road-widening aimed at managing traffic on major roads at the projected Town Center commercial-residential project.

      5. Allows the Town Center developers to use 12,000 square feet authorized as part of the residential component to be used instead for  office space on the second floor of commercial buildings. This could  increase town tax revenues slightly. (A
      hint of today's residential market: New condos  at the Natick Collection are not selling well.) 

      The residential component will remain at 100 units. Large-scale changes in the plan would require new zoning, officials told voters.

       6. Clarifies regulations for large-scale earth moving on private property.

      7. Updates town regulations on disposal of surplus property  -- not including real estate -- to allow the threshold to match state regulations with no future action by Town Meeting. What happens when  the town wants to dispose of, say, an old
      truck? It will normally be advertised in the newspaper, officials said.

      9. Meets state requirement by designating the Board of Road Commissioners to issue permits for excavating trenches on private  land.

      10. Establishes a trust fund for employee benefits, as is required by law.

      13. Allocates $50,000 from Wayland's Community Preservation funds to maintain the 1881 railroad freight house on Concord Road, near the  Library. Wayland is one of the few towns where old passenger and freight buildings remain usable and in
      their original locations. 

      The  freight house is used for storage by the library and the Park and  Recreation Department. The restored Depot, across the street, is a non-profit boutique.

      14. Allows $15,000 for Park & Rec to plant shade trees in various  locations. The money is part of a settlement with the developer of Wayland Commons. The developer is paying separately to replace illegally felled trees near the 40B housing project
      on Route 27.

      15. The Conservation Commission passed over (withdrew) the article, saying that as written it wouldn't solve the problem of professiona dog walkers exercising  large numbers of dogs on conservation land.   

      This is a big issue with residents living near or using the land.  The ConCom hopes to have a comprehensive article ready for annual Town Meeting in April.

      16. Increases dog license fees (for example, $15 for an annual license  rather than $10). A voter moved to amend the article to give jurisdiction to the Board of Health rather than the Board of  Selectmen. The amended article passed with no
      discussion.

      17. Creates a penalty of $100 per day for  violations of regulations for Conservation Commission lands. Why is this non-criminal bylaw needed? 

      As a member of the ConCom explained, some people  use motor vehicles and  non-permitted bikes, build bonfires, remove native  plants, dig for artifacts (in violation of state law), dump landscaping waste and even steal vegetables from
      community gardens.

      In the absence of a penalty, such people tend to respond to   reprimands with "quite rude retorts."

       19. Passed over. The article would have allowed the town to buy property at 41 River Road which is under litigation. Action isn't  possible because there isn't  an agreement on the price.

      And the whole meeting was over in about two hours! Registered attendance was 242.

      WHY NO LIVE TELECAST?

      Town Meeting was held at the Middle School because renovations at the High School field house are behind schedule. The gym lacks cable connections for live  broadcasting, so WayCAM broadcast the meeting four times on the following Friday and
      Sunday.

      The selectmen wanted  WayCAM to provide the cabling at a cost of about $2,000. WayCAM said the money wasn't in its budget. The School Department had no interest in providing the cable for what might be a  one-time use.

       In the past the selectmen had paid up to $15,000 to hire professionals for live broadcasts. In times like these, should anybody be complaining about saving a little money?

       -- Michael Short


      ==================================================
      To be sure you continue to receive WVN newsletters optimally and in your inbox (instead of bulk or junk folders) it may help to add to your address book or safe sender list:
      waylandvoters@...
      waylandvoters1@...
      ==================================================

      Thank you for reading this WVN newsletter. Please forward it to your friends and neighbors in Wayland. If they want to receive their own copy, they can send an email to
      waylandvoters@... and they will be signed up for the listserv. 

      Or, they can sign themselves up by sending a blank email to:
      waylandvotersnetwork-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
      Click reply and send after receiving an e-mail confirming the subscription.

      Wayland Voters Network
      Michael Short, Editor