Re: Broken syntax in vim.vim
- On 26-Jun-2013 19:18 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> [44 lines deleted]While I respect your decision to keep the dev process as it currently
> Right. I don't know how this got there. If it really is for syntax
> highlighting it should be in the syntax plugin, not the ftplugin.
works for you, and while I don't want to resurrect the old discussion
can't stop myself from mentioning that with atomic commits of runtime
changes (like you do for source code patches), there would be a much
better chance of determining what this change was about. (Assuming you
had written a suitable commit message.)
Come on, you could just give it a try and do slightly more fine-grained
commits of runtime updates in the future. If it's too much effort, just
revert back to the bulky updates (occasionally).
> In case of doubt I prefer to leave 'iskeyword' alone.Alright, so you're going to remove "isk+=:", but keep "isk+=#" (which is
undisputedly beneficial) in ftplugin/vim.vim?! Thanks!
-- regards, ingo
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.