Re: [patch] get quickfix stack
- On 22 May 2013, Christian Brabandt <cblists@...> wrote:
> Hi LCD!Hmm, this is interesting. I can reproduce the problem if I run
> On Mi, 22 Mai 2013, LCD 47 wrote:
> > On 22 May 2013, LCD 47 <lcd047@...> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Excellent, thank you! I'll play with it for a while, then
> > > post my conclusions.
> > There seems to be a bug in getlocstack(), it misses the first
> > entry. Example: after a single run of syntastic check:
> > :echo len(getlocstack(0))
> > 3
> > :echo len(getloctitle(0))
> > 4
> > Here getloctitle() seems to work correctly.
> I don't see this. How did you make this? (I only checked by calling
> :setloclist(0, [...]) several times and not sure how to make syntastic
> do this.
syntastic check (getlocstack() is missing the first entry), but not if I
start from scratch and I create a few loclists with lvimgrep
(getlocstack() is working fine in that case). The difference is that
syntastic runs lmake, then calls setloclist() a number of times.
> > Also getlocstackptr() should probably return -1 rather than 0 if the[...]
> > stack is empty (calling getlocstack() to find out is expensive in
> > terms of memory).
> Ok. Updated the patch.
Excellent, thank you!
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.