On Thursday, April 25, 2013 5:21:41 PM UTC-5, v...@... wrote:
> Comment #1 on issue 131 by Go.Zu...@...: Wrong phrasing in
> I think that:
> to substitute 'new' for 'old' is equivalent with: to replace old with new
It is, but it's a less commonly used phrasing, so it is confusing to some.
I see the meaning but the OP reversed the meaning.
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.