Re: Weird:: substitute by using register with combinations
- On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:17 AM, John Little <John.B.Little@...> wrote:
> Yes, with one, but the test would not have found the problem (with more than one combining char) that you fixed with the second patch. I just meant to suggest that the test have such a character. If someone could find a character with more, that would be interesting, though the test might then interact with the 'maxcombine' option.For better test coverage, I added two more characters to the test, with
two and three combining characters, respectively (real examples).
I didn't study the patch, though.
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.