Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> On 28/05/11 19:59, Danek Duvall wrote:
> >Or perhaps there's a smooth, generic patch-flow I'm not seeing where this
> >problem isn't actually a problem.
> See http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Getting_the_Vim_source_with_Mercurial
Yes, I can do that, but our build infrastructure is currently designed with
tarballs and patches in mind, not SCMs. That said, using an SCM URL in
place of a tarball URL is something I've wanted for a while, so perhaps I
should spend some time designing that into the tools if vim's tarball/patch
model is broken.
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php