Re: Oops (Was: Re: cygwin gcc buidling gvimext.dll fails)
- Christian J. Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:So we now have a situation where we can either build a version for Win
> > On 8/01/10 7:46 PM, Christian J. Robinson wrote:
> >> Oops, the subject should have been uninstal.c, not gvimext.dll
> > The problem is that WINVER is defined as 0x0400 in Make_ming.mak and
> > RegKeyDeleteEx is only available with WINVER 0x0502 and above.
> I'm using Make_cyg.mak, but the same holds true there. I changed it
> to 0x0502 and the error disappeared.
2000 that won't work on 64-bit windows, or a version that supports
64-bit but won't run on Windows 2000?
How about this:
# Set the default $(WINVER) use 0x0400 to make the exe work with pre-Win2k
WINVER = 0x0502
Article in the first Free Software Magazine: "Bram Moolenaar studied electrical
engineering at the Technical University of Delft and graduated in 1985 on a
multi-processor Unix architecture."
Response by "dimator": Could the school not afford a proper stage for the
/// Bram Moolenaar -- Bram@... -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php