Re: Patch 7.2a.001
- On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:39 PM, James Vega <jamessan@...> wrote:
>> One feedback: we should try to keep the patch numbers from Bram in theI managed to find a neat way to do this.
>> shortlog, shouldn't we ?
> *shrug* I went back and forth on that and ended up leaving it as is
> since that's the way I started.
>> My commit's dates are based on the ftp server: I guess a cleanergood hint. actually, it's inside each patch itself (just need to look
>> approach should be to scan the mailing list archives or copy the dates
>> from cvs.
> I had thought about making git record the date as when the patch was
> released but since that information isn't in the patch itself, gave up
> on it.
for the date of version.c updates).
>well, I know the pristine tar habits you have... I want to focus on
>> I'm consolidating the repo then I'll find a web server to host it.
>> Thanks for the git address.
> Cool. I'm sure people will find a repo meant purely for replication
> instead of my specific needs more useful.
vim+extra+all patches only.
It's progressing well. Just cpu time mostly...
http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/, a linux distribution for Qemu with Git inside !
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php