Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: One Mailaddress

Expand Messages
  • Tony Mechelynck
    ... I think we still do. On this post of yours, I see vim_dev@googlegroups.com in all of To , Sender , Reply-To , List-Id and List-Post . I agree that
    Message 1 of 10 , Jul 21, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      Nikolai Weibull wrote:
      > On 7/21/07, Tony Mechelynck <antoine.mechelynck@...> wrote:
      >
      >> Notice that whenever someone uses "vim-dev@..." the list robot will add
      >> "vim_dev@..." in the To line.
      >
      > No. It adds a Reply-To. That's a crap setup by Google Groups, but
      > there's probably nothing we can do about it. Seeing as this is the
      > case, perhaps using the @... addresses makes more sense,
      > as we won't get the stupid Reply-To added.
      >
      > nikolai

      I think we still do. On this post of yours, I see vim_dev@... in
      all of "To", "Sender", "Reply-To", "List-Id" and "List-Post".

      I agree that that "Reply-To" header is stupid, and we're not alone in thinking
      so, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html -- however I also agree
      that in the case of Google Groups there's probably nothing we can do about it.


      Best regards,
      Tony.
      --
      The National Short-Sleeved Shirt Association says:
      Support your right to bare arms!

      --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
      You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
      For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
      -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    • Ali Akcaagac
      ... The @vim.org addresses are blacklisted with web.de and bounce back. Greetings, Ali Akcaagac --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You
      Message 2 of 10 , Jul 21, 2007
      • 0 Attachment
        On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 13:09 +0200, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
        > We may still use the old @... addresses, if we want to, and don't prefer
        > (or don't have to use) the Google Groups *web* interface. However you seem not to.

        The @... addresses are blacklisted with web.de and bounce back.

        Greetings,

        Ali Akcaagac


        --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
        You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
        For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
        -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
      • Tony Mechelynck
        ... Well, that s another reason some people can t use @vim.org then; though I wonder why some ISP would blacklist outgoing mail to @vim.org. Best regards,
        Message 3 of 10 , Jul 21, 2007
        • 0 Attachment
          Ali Akcaagac wrote:
          > On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 13:09 +0200, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
          >> We may still use the old @... addresses, if we want to, and don't prefer
          >> (or don't have to use) the Google Groups *web* interface. However you seem not to.
          >
          > The @... addresses are blacklisted with web.de and bounce back.
          >
          > Greetings,
          >
          > Ali Akcaagac

          Well, that's another reason some people can't use @... then; though I
          wonder why some ISP would blacklist outgoing mail to @....


          Best regards,
          Tony.
          --
          If you've seen one redwood, you've seen them all.
          -- Ronald Reagan

          --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
          You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
          For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
          -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
        • Gautam Iyer
          Is the multiple addresses really such an issue? Most mail filters should be able to support primitive regexps... If anyone would find it useful, I have the
          Message 4 of 10 , Jul 21, 2007
          • 0 Attachment
            Is the multiple addresses really such an issue? Most mail filters should
            be able to support primitive regexps...

            If anyone would find it useful, I have the following in my
            ~/.procmailrc:

            :0
            * ^TO_(vim-experiment|vim[_-]dev)@(googlegroups.com|vim.org)
            {
            :0
            * !^Subject: +(Re: +)*\[.+\]
            {
            :0 fhw
            * ^Subject:\/.*
            | formail -I "Subject: [vim-dev]$MATCH"
            }

            :0:
            lists
            }

            It adds a friendly [vim-dev] prefix to email subjects (if there isn't
            already a subject prefix), and delivers it to my lists folder.

            GI

            --
            Name one nice thing about Windows? It doesn't just crash, it displays a
            dialog box and lets you press 'OK' first.

            --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
            You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
            For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
            -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
          Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.