Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>Thanks for making this patch. It looks useful.
>I think it would be good to add some error handling: what if the number
>entered is out of range for the number of windows?
Giving out of range number to <C-w>w, vim shows no error and
goes to the window that has the largest number.
Same for <CR> in that patch. I think it's consistent.
>One problem: when the count is not given it should still use ".cc" and
>".ll" as before.
Yes, the patch works that way.