Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Why --with-features=huge does not include popular interpreters (perl, python) ?

Expand Messages
  • Benji Fisher
    ... IIUC, huge currently means the same thing as big, with the idea that in some future version there may be a difference. In other words, it is reserved for
    Message 1 of 3 , May 11, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:46:31AM +0200, Yakov Lerner wrote:
      > I wonder what's the logic behind the thing that interpreters
      > are not included in --with-features=huge ? (like, perl, python, etc) ?
      >
      > Is it just historical ? Maybe we can have a variation of 'huge'
      > that included interpreters (like, --with-features=huge+interpreters) ?
      >
      > Yakov

      IIUC, huge currently means the same thing as big, with the idea
      that in some future version there may be a difference. In other words,
      it is reserved for future use. Personally, I agree with you: including
      perl, python, ruby, and tcl would be a reasonable use of huge.

      --Benji
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.