On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:46:31AM +0200, Yakov Lerner wrote:
> I wonder what's the logic behind the thing that interpreters
> are not included in --with-features=huge ? (like, perl, python, etc) ?
> Is it just historical ? Maybe we can have a variation of 'huge'
> that included interpreters (like, --with-features=huge+interpreters) ?
IIUC, huge currently means the same thing as big, with the idea
that in some future version there may be a difference. In other words,
it is reserved for future use. Personally, I agree with you: including
perl, python, ruby, and tcl would be a reasonable use of huge.