Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: Vim from CVS and :version

Expand Messages
  • Johannes Zellner
    ... The CVS repository is updated automatically with Bram s patches in the order they arrive here. So if patch 103 arrives before 102, it is applied before
    Message 1 of 2 , Jan 2, 2002
      On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 01:59:58PM -0500, Bill McCarthy wrote:
      > I maintain separate directories for the console and gui
      > versions to provide a fast compile/link cycle. The gui
      > version is maintained through CVS. The console version is
      > maintained by hand - when I get around to applying patches.
      >
      > Since they use different directory structures, one can't
      > apply all the patches to the windows directory structure.
      > So my :ve shows the holes - that are patches that don't
      > apply to windows. Here's what it looks like (reformatted):
      >
      > MS-Windows 32 bit console version
      > Included patches: 1-2, 4-8, 10-11, 13-25, 27-45, 47-51, 54,
      > 56-59, 61-66, 68-82, 84-86, 88-93, 95-97,
      > 99-103
      >
      > The gui version from CVS has ALL the patches, but they
      > appear to have been applied out of order. Couldn't this
      > cause a patch to "unpatch" something by applying them out of
      > order? Here's what :ve shows for patch level 103:
      >
      > MS-Windows 32 bit GUI version
      > Included patches: 2, 1, 3-49, 51, 50, 52-65, 67, 66, 68-70,
      > 72, 71, 73-86, 88, 87, 89-93, 97, 96, 95,
      > 94, 99, 98, 101, 100, 102-103

      The CVS repository is updated automatically with Bram's patches in
      the order they arrive here. So if patch 103 arrives before 102, it
      is applied before 102.

      --
      Johannes
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.