Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: exporer script

Expand Messages
  • Benoit Cerrina
    This is funny, I have the same configuration and all seems to work as expected. Benoit ... From: Denis Perelyubskiy To: Mark Waggoner
    Message 1 of 4 , Apr 2, 2001
      This is funny,
      I have the same configuration and all seems to work as expected.
      Benoit
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Denis Perelyubskiy" <denisp@...>
      To: "Mark Waggoner" <waggoner@...>
      Cc: <vim-dev@...>
      Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 2:24 AM
      Subject: Re: exporer script


      > hello,
      >
      > sorry i should've mentioned this the first time around.
      > i am using vim 6.0w on win2k.
      >
      > denis
      >
      > ps. I also have cygwin installed, and my shell set to
      > c:/cygwin/bin/bash.exe so, maybe that could have something
      > to do with this?
      >
      >
      > On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Mark Waggoner wrote:
      >
      > >
      > >That's strange. Although 2.3 is slightly behind the cutting edge, I
      > >just tried it and it seemed to work fine. The latest version of vim
      > >(vim 6.0z) has explorer version 2.4 (though I see I didn't update the
      > >header to actually SAY 2.4) It seems to work fine for this sequence
      > >of commands also. I'm trying it on linux. Perhaps more information
      > >about your platform and vim version would help.
      > >
      > >On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
      > >
      > >> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
      > >> From: Denis Perelyubskiy <denisp@...>
      > >> To: vim-dev@...
      > >> Subject: exporer script
      > >>
      > >> hello,
      > >>
      > >> i havent been paying much attention to Explore script, and i
      > >> just tried it and it turned out amazingly easy and usefull
      > >> and actually usable :) ... thanks for the script
      > >>
      > >> I had one question though: when I start ":Explore" and then
      > >> type '-' to go up one level, i am taken to an empty window
      > >> (with the status line giving me the directory which in fact
      > >> is one level up). If i then again type ":Explore" I am taken
      > >> to the listing.
      > >>
      > >> Is this an expected behavior? Do I have an older version of
      > >> the script? (I have version 2.3)
      > >>
      > >> thanks,
      > >>
      > >> denis
      > >>
      > >> --
      > >> /*
      > >> * Denis Perelyubskiy
      > >> * mailto:denisp@...
      > >> */
      > >>
      > >
      >
      >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      > >Mark Waggoner waggoner@... (503)
      712-3335
      > > Like "Constantinople" and "Timbuktu"
      > >
      >
      > --
      > /*
      > * Denis Perelyubskiy
      > * mailto:denisp@...
      > */
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.