Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: bug in exists()

Expand Messages
  • c928400@student.dtu.dk
    ... My bad, I did mean :command s indeed. Sorry for any confusion. Peppe -- Before you criticize someone, walk Preben Peppe Guldberg __/- __ a mile
    Message 1 of 5 , Jan 30, 2001
    • 0 Attachment
      Thus wrote Benji Fisher (benji@...) on [010130]:
      > c928400@... wrote:
      > > Sounds like a good idea to me. Otherwise a check for a specific
      > > function is nearly impossible (off my head, I would think that
      > > redirecting ":com ..." to a variable might be the only way)

      > I think it is only an issue for commands, not functions. I agree
      > that returning 2 would work. I want some way to check for :Foo without
      > being confused by :FooBar.

      My bad, I did mean :command's indeed. Sorry for any confusion.

      Peppe
      --
      "Before you criticize someone, walk
      Preben "Peppe" Guldberg __/-\__ a mile in his shoes. That way, if
      c928400@... (o o) he gets angry, he'll be a mile away
      ----------------------oOOo (_) oOOo-- - and barefoot." --Sarah Jackson
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.