Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

bug in perl syntax highlightning

Expand Messages
  • Wichert Akkerman
    Somsone just told me that the perl statement printf( $@ ); messes up the syntax highlighting. It seems that hasn t been fixed in vim6.0d :( Does anyone
    Message 1 of 4 , Aug 2, 2000
    • 0 Attachment
      Somsone just told me that the perl statement printf("$@"); messes up the
      syntax highlighting. It seems that hasn't been fixed in vim6.0d :(
      Does anyone have/know a fix?

      Wichert.

      --
      _________________________________________________________________
      / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
      | wichert@... http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
      | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
    • Thomas Köhler
      On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 04:49:55PM +0200, ... Can t reproduce this here. Can you explain more about this? ... CU, Thomas -- Thomas Köhler Email:
      Message 2 of 4 , Aug 2, 2000
      • 0 Attachment
        On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 04:49:55PM +0200,
        Wichert Akkerman <wichert@...> wrote:
        >
        > Somsone just told me that the perl statement printf("$@"); messes up the
        > syntax highlighting. It seems that hasn't been fixed in vim6.0d :(
        > Does anyone have/know a fix?

        Can't reproduce this here. Can you explain more about this?

        > Wichert.

        CU,
        Thomas

        --
        Thomas Köhler Email: jean-luc@... | LCARS - Linux
        <>< WWW: http://jeanluc-picard.de | for Computers
        IRC: jeanluc | on All Real
        PGP public key available from Homepage! | Starships
      • Wichert Akkerman
        ... Ah, hmm, euh, strange. Seems I tested this on a machine with an older vim and it s fixed in a recent one (6.0b at least). Time for an upgrade round I
        Message 3 of 4 , Aug 2, 2000
        • 0 Attachment
          Previously Thomas K?hler wrote:
          > Can't reproduce this here. Can you explain more about this?

          Ah, hmm, euh, strange. Seems I tested this on a machine with an older
          vim and it's fixed in a recent one (6.0b at least). Time for an upgrade
          round I guess.

          Wichert.

          --
          _________________________________________________________________
          / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
          | wichert@... http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
          | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
        • Thomas Köhler
          On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 06:35:49PM +0200, ... In fact, I can t even reproduce the problem with vim-5.7a :) ... CU, Thomas -- Thomas Köhler Email:
          Message 4 of 4 , Aug 2, 2000
          • 0 Attachment
            On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 06:35:49PM +0200,
            Wichert Akkerman <wichert@...> wrote:
            >
            > Previously Thomas K?hler wrote:
            > > Can't reproduce this here. Can you explain more about this?
            >
            > Ah, hmm, euh, strange. Seems I tested this on a machine with an older
            > vim and it's fixed in a recent one (6.0b at least). Time for an upgrade
            > round I guess.

            In fact, I can't even reproduce the problem with vim-5.7a :)

            > Wichert.

            CU,
            Thomas

            --
            Thomas Köhler Email: jean-luc@... | LCARS - Linux
            <>< WWW: http://jeanluc-picard.de | for Computers
            IRC: jeanluc | on All Real
            PGP public key available from Homepage! | Starships
          Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.