Re: C Preprocessor syntax
- Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> John Lonergan wrote:m4 is a better preprocessor for arbitrary languages and
> > Can this be separated out as a separate syntax file in future releases so
> > that it can be included in hybrids with other languages lacking a build in
> > preprocessor (eg html/java).
> It would be possible. But there will probably be some interaction between the
> preprocessor and the language. It would also be possible to copy the relevant
> code from c.vim. Would that be a big problem?
it already has its own syntax file. you could try that.