Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

71258Incorrect highlighting with re=1 introduced by 7.3.1191

Expand Messages
  • Dominique PellĂ©
    Jun 14 2:20 PM

      These 2 commands which only differ by using re=1 or re=2
      do not highlight the same text. It's correct with re=2 and
      incorrect with re=1 (with re=1, the second line is not
      entirely highlighted, but it should be):

      $ vim -u NONE --noplugin -N -c 'set hls re=1' \
      -c 'call feedkeys("aaaa\<cr>aaa\<cr>bbb\<cr>\<esc>/^.\\(.\\).\\_..\\1.\<cr>")'

      $ vim -u NONE --noplugin -N -c 'set hls re=2' \
      -c 'call feedkeys("aaaa\<cr>aaa\<cr>bbb\<cr>\<esc>/^.\\(.\\).\\_..\\1.\<cr>")'

      It was fine in vim-7.3.1190 and the regression
      started in 7.3.1191. It's also broken in the latest


      You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
      Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
      For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

      You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
      To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscribe@....
      For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
    • Show all 5 messages in this topic