69656Re: To all syntax file maintainers: examples needed
- May 15, 2013Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi Bram!You could try synchk
> On Mo, 13 Mai 2013, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>> Not. I only want to work with the syntax files that I have, which are
>> the distributed ones. I'm not going to download and install syntax
>> files for this test.
>> There are more than 500 syntax files, that should be more than enough.
> I didn't mean that you were supposed to test those files. I wanted to
> know how maintainers of unofficial syntax files can test the new RE
Before using new re:
run :ManyMakeSynChk *.[your-favorite-suffix-here]
After new re:
run :ManySynChk *.[your-favorite-suffix-here]
The first command generates a lot of synchk/*.synchk files, which
contain a hashed version of the syntax on each line.
The second command compares newly generated hashed versions of the
syntax on each line with the stored hashes.
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>