69179Re: Variable for "motion type" in Operator-pending mode
- Apr 19, 2013On Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:50:58 AM UTC+9, glts wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Ingo Karkat wrote:+1 to v:motiontype.
> > With v:motiontype, I'd expect that to be applicable to _every_ motion,
> > not just those few special ones. I would prefer v:forcedmotiontype. The
> > only saving grace for this unreadable monster is that it's probably not
> > going to be used very much.
> I don't care too much about the name, to be frank. In the end it's
> mostly a matter of taste.
> But let me rephrase my argument in favour of v:motiontype. The docs say
> that the variable is empty when no motion type is given. Empty
> essentially means "use the default motion type". "v/V/<C-V>" means
> "override the default motion type with X-wise motion". So in any case
> the variable asserts something about the type of motion.
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>