Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

69179Re: Variable for "motion type" in Operator-pending mode

Expand Messages
  • Kana Natsuno
    Apr 19, 2013
      On Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:50:58 AM UTC+9, glts wrote:
      > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Ingo Karkat wrote:
      > > With v:motiontype, I'd expect that to be applicable to _every_ motion,
      > > not just those few special ones. I would prefer v:forcedmotiontype. The
      > > only saving grace for this unreadable monster is that it's probably not
      > > going to be used very much.
      >
      > I don't care too much about the name, to be frank. In the end it's
      > mostly a matter of taste.
      >
      > But let me rephrase my argument in favour of v:motiontype. The docs say
      > that the variable is empty when no motion type is given. Empty
      > essentially means "use the default motion type". "v/V/<C-V>" means
      > "override the default motion type with X-wise motion". So in any case
      > the variable asserts something about the type of motion.

      +1 to v:motiontype.

      --
      --
      You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
      Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
      For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

      ---
      You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
      To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscribe@....
      For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
    • Show all 6 messages in this topic