69017Re: RDF manifests highlighted as error from line 2 to the end
- Apr 8, 2013On 08/04/13 05:34, Axel Castellane wrote:
> Sorry for the late answer. redif files do have comments that start withThis is an unhappy choice, since the W3C recommends *.rdf (with an
> /^#/, but they are likely to have no comment at all since they are very
> However, any redif file must have a name in *.rdf, and must also have [...]
all-lowercase extension) for RDF/XML files, see
However, ReDIF seems rather confidential: I could find nothing about it
on Wikipedia (in any of English, French and German, except as the
reserve force of former Turkish and Egyptian armies), and a Google
search yielded only
http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/rpcrdfdoc/redif.htm which resends to
http://openlib.org/acmes/root/docu/redif_1.html — a document dated
2007-06-01, with no Table of Contents, where the string "rdf" does not
appear at all (in any character case), and where it is said that the
default charset for ReDIF files is Windows-1252 (!), though UTF-8 is
recommended and must be heralded by a BOM.
Couldn't RePEc and the W3C agree on file extensions? Isn't there a
central place where extensions and MIME types (application/rdf+xml, in
the case of RDF/XML files) are registered? Or do organizations grab any
three-letter group that suits their fancy, without checking if someone
somewhere uses the same file extension for a different purpose?
Learned men are the cisterns of knowledge, not the fountainheads.
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>