68604Re: Behaviour of :normal in operator-pending mode is not defined
- Mar 7, 2013David Bürgin wrote:
> I see. I was thinking about it the wrong way then.Thanks!
> On Thursday, March 7, 2013 5:35:24 PM UTC+1, Ben Fritz wrote:
> > > gUe suMMER
> > > :norm! gUe<CR> suMMER
> > > gU:norm! e<CR> suMMEr
> > I'm not sure if this is documented (I couldn't find it mentioned
> > explicitly) but if I recall correctly, any : command in operator-pending
> > mode acts as an exclusive motion.
> Yes, I did see that in the code for the colon command at normal.c#5398:
> if (cap->oap->op_type != OP_NOP)
> /* Using ":" as a movement is characterwise exclusive. */
> cap->oap->motion_type = MCHAR;
> cap->oap->inclusive = FALSE;
> I added a note in the documentation and removed a now invalid item from
> the todo list.
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
29. Your phone bill comes to your doorstep in a box.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- Bram@... -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
- << Previous post in topic