Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

64445Re: 'backupcopy' and Windows Vista symbolic links

Expand Messages
  • Bram Moolenaar
    Mar 15, 2012
      David Pope wrote:

      > On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 3:54:09 PM UTC-4, Craig Barkhouse wrote:
      > > The mch_is_linked() function in os_win32.c only checks if there is
      > > more than one hard link (i.e. name) for the file. It doesn't check
      > > if the file is a symbolic link. By contrast the Unix code does
      > > check if the file is a symbolic link.
      > >
      > > Sounds like a TODO item.
      > Hello all, did this ever get turned into a TODO item? I've
      > encountered this myself (I'm syncing all my vim configuration across
      > machines using Dropbox, with symbolic links for .vim/, .vimrc, and
      > .gvimrc).
      > I see in the latest Mercurial code that mch_is_linked() still only
      > checks for hard links. If it's not already in someone's TODO bucket I
      > can work on a fix. The APIs are straightforward in the versions of
      > Windows that support symlinks; I suspect more of the work will be in
      > figuring out how to get that support into vim without breaking binary
      > compatibility on older systems. Would the maintainers be interested
      > in seeing a patch for this?

      A patch definitely helps. And a way to reproduce the problem.

      hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
      194. Your business cards contain your e-mail and home page address.

      /// Bram Moolenaar -- Bram@... -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
      /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
      \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
      \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///

      You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
      Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
      For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
    • Show all 16 messages in this topic