57173Re: Progress indicator for :TOhtml command
- Jun 1 7:43 AMOn May 31, 10:50 pm, Yongwei Wu <wuyong...@...> wrote:
> On 1 June 2010 04:47, Benjamin Fritz <fritzophre...@...> wrote:I am fine with tabs or spaces for indentation. I am NOT fine with a
> And there was nothing to "fix" about the tabs. They were perfectly
> fine. Tabstop was set to the default (8), and only shiftwidth was set
> to 2 (along with sts, which does not affect the saved file). You
> seemed to have confused them. The original version is easier to view
> (using type/cat/more/less or nearly anything).
mixture of the two. From the previous modeline, I assumed that the
intent was a tab-based indent. You are free to change the tabstop to
view the file, but if you edit the file using a 'shiftwidth' and
'tabstop' value that differ, the indentation will become a mixture of
tabs and spaces, so that changing tabstop no longer looks right.
I did not modify the value of 'sts', that was already there.
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>