Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

54978Re: Bug: 'l' breaks macro when run at the end of line

Expand Messages
  • Bram Moolenaar
    Sep 15, 2009
      Milan Vancura wrote:

      > thank you for the answer.
      > > The main reason is Vi compatibility.
      > So what about an option changing this behaviour (causing all movements throwing
      > an error if they can't be done) and add that option to be a part of what
      > 'compatible' sets?
      > > The reasoning is that if the cursor doesn't move at all for a movement
      > > command then it's an error. If it can move less than intended then this
      > > is not handled like an error. It's common to do 999l to go as far right
      > > as possible.
      > As I mentioned above: I think the right behaviour is that '999l' ends with an
      > error if there are less than 999 chars to the right and users should use '$'
      > for reaching the end of line.
      > > Note that there are a few exceptions, again for Vi compatibility.
      > Sure, I understand. I will not fight if you say strict 'no' to my idea.

      In my opinion there are too many options already. I don't like
      confusing the user with yet another way to change behavior in mysterious

      "After a few years of marriage a man can look right at a woman
      without seeing her and a woman can see right through a man
      without looking at him."
      - Helen Rowland

      /// Bram Moolenaar -- Bram@... -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
      /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
      \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
      \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///

      You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
      For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
    • Show all 13 messages in this topic