48401Re: creating a development environemnt for VIM
- Nov 7 10:12 AMHi Matthew
Ok thanks for your help. You were right, this works like a charm on
Gutsy, and before i tried it on fiesty. I am now building and even
On Nov 5, 8:30 pm, Matthew Wozniski <m...@...> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 04:45:54AM +0100, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> > Matthew Wozniski wrote:
> > > Also, this doesn't belong on vim-dev, it belongs on vim-use. vim-dev is for
> > > submitting and discussing bug reports and patches. I'm setting the reply-to
> > > address accordingly.
> > > ~Matt
> > You didn't, or Google Groups overrode you, but that doesn't matter. Vim-dev is
> > also for questions about configuring and compiling Vim. These questions
> > definitely belong here.
> Ah, terribly sorry. Usually, -dev groups are only for patches/bug reports.
> And google groups definitely just overrode me. Ah, well.
> > As I said a couple of days ago, see also
> >http://users.skynet.be/antoine.mechelynck/vim/compunix.htmfor a step-by-step
> > tutorial about building Vim from the official sources (not any "debian" or
> > "ubuntu" sources which might be less than up-to-date or contain patches not
> > sactioned by Bram) on any Unix-like system.
> They cannot be out of date, since part of the install process ftp's
> down the latest patches from ftp.vim.org, and they produce packages
> that can be installed through your package manager, rather than
> requiring contortions to track dynamic library dependencies and such.
> ./configure && make && make install is nice and all, but it has
> serious shortcomings in terms of versioning and cleanup, especially
> with regard to tracking which versions of all of your shared object
> files you still need around on your system.
> Of course, they do include a few unofficial patches (25 in the latest
> Ubuntu sources), but that's certainly not a bad thing; it is, after
> all, how open source moves forward, and most of them will certainly be
> moved to upstream as soon as the distro maintainers have time to
> handle it.
> I find it rather silly to suggest using `make install' when there's
> a better alternative being offered.
> > Best regards,
> > Tony.
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
- << Previous post in topic