Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

32350RE: [PATCH] 6.2b Multiple syntax views, conceal, cursorbind

Expand Messages
  • Vince Negri
    May 2, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      > Boring detail. I get vim from ftp. I hit the following discrepancies
      > with a plain vanilla vim62b.
      I haven't tried diffing against the 62b tarball.
      (I always get cvs.) It sounds like there may
      be a discrepancy in the docs area? Ahh.. my fault,
      i hadn't done a cvs update in the docs folder
      (blush)

      > I hit the following diagnostics with
      > nmake /f make_ivc.mak cfg="Vim - Win32 Debug vim"

      > cl.exe /nologo /MT /W3 /GX /I ".\proto" /D "WIN32" /c /Zi /Od /D
      "_DEBUG" /Fd.\Dbg/ >/Fo.\Dbg/ .\move.c
      >move.c
      >.\move.c(2819) : warning C4013: 'diff_get_corresponding_line' undefined;
      assuming extern returning int

      > link.exe oldnames.lib ...
      >move.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
      _diff_get_corresponding_line
      >.\vimd.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
      >NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'link.exe' : return code '0x460'
      >Stop.

      Gah, the patch file is missing a diff against diff.c and diff.pro.
      I'll create and upload a new patch file. However I can't
      upload it from here so I'll send you a copy directly,
      Walter.

      Vince

      Legal Disclaimer: Any views expressed by the sender of this message are
      not necessarily those of Application Solutions Ltd. Information in this
      e-mail may be confidential and is for the use of the intended recipient
      only, no mistake in transmission is intended to waive or compromise such
      privilege. Please advise the sender if you receive this e-mail by mistake.
    • Show all 3 messages in this topic