27964Re: vim.org reviewed and classified
- Apr 1 3:47 AMOn Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:45:47PM +1000, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
> *** I don't believe that www.vim.org should merely point to vim.sf.net.I agree, mostly -- what had been discussed before was a pre-vimonline vimonline
> People visiting a site like vim.org for the first time expect a neat summary
> of the product and links to other information. They don't expect, and
> generally wouldn't appreciate, an automated page that dives right in to tips
> and scripts.
> www.vim.org should contain the following things:
> [ list snipped ]
page, which would contain just the static 'about' information, as well as news
and a link to further information (ie, deeper into vimonline.)
As for the FAQ, I think the might already be one -- I'm not sure if the one
that Sven links is still maintained, or whether it has died.
Check it out. ;)
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>