RE: Inclusive movement
- Dunno if you've got any response to this (email was a spot
inconsistent), but I've always understood the cusor to not actually be
ON the letter, but rather just BEFORE it; a lot of the operations make
more sense to me if I think about the cursor in this manner...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dcuaron@... [mailto:dcuaron@...]
> Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 12:09 AM
> To: vim@...
> Subject: Inclusive movement
> Just curious F and T are listed as inclusive movements but if
> you are editing the following
> one two
> and the cursor is positioned on the t and you do dFe you get...
> ontwo if the movement is inclusive shouldn't you get onwo
> when you perform dge and your cursor is on the t in two you
> get onwo. Both F and ge are listed as inclusive movements so
> shouldn't dF and dge act the same way assuming they start in
> the same place. Given the string
> you would think df5 (assuming the cursor were on the 0) and
> dF0 (assuming the cursor were on the 5) would completely
> delete it. Just curious....