Re: "set fo=taqm" in .vimrc doesn't produce expected behavior
- * Antoine J. Mechelynck <antoine.mechelynck@...> [2003-09-29 21:37]:
> Marc Adler <com.adlerpacific@...> wrote:Strange things are afoot at RH. I even heard them called the Microsoft
> > * Antoine J. Mechelynck <antoine.mechelynck@...> [2003-09-29
> > 20:56]:
> > > Marc Adler <com.adlerpacific@...> wrote:
> > > > * Gary Johnson <garyjohn@...> [2003-09-29 19:03]:
> > > > > On 2003-09-29, Marc Adler <com.adlerpacific@...>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > * Gary Johnson <garyjohn@...> [2003-09-29 07:46]:
> > > > > > > On 2003-09-28, Marc Adler
> > > > > > > <com.adlerpacific@...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
> > > Beware of reintroducing it the next time you upgrade. Or take your
> > > Vim upgrades online rather than from the RH CDs. (IIRC, just
> > > yesterday I saw an announce about a version of Vim, freshly
> > > compiled and built onto RPM files compatible with RH systems.)
> > Thanks for the tip. What do you mean by taking my upgrades online? Do
> > you mean upgrading from the new versions as they are announced on
> > www.vim.org?
> Yep. And not only on www.vim.org (which usually only has the unpatched
> release in binary, if you want the latest update from there you have to
> compile it yourself) but also third-party builds announced on vim@...
> > Also, you might have heard already, but there isn't going
> > to be RH 10. It has become Fedora. I wonder if they will also include
> > the line in the script.
> I dodn't know. And I wonder too. I also wonder why they changed a
> widely-known and successful label. Havent they heard of "Don't change a
> winning team", or "If 't'ain' broke, don' fix it"?
of Linux the other day...
Anyway, thanks for all the advice!
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:26:01 -1000
Mutt 1.4.1i (2003-03-19)
You are a banana moon subverting the sun.
-- the surreal compliment generator