Re: alternate buffers
- Russell Shaw wrote:
> Michael P. Soulier wrote:The file explorer is what is messing you up. When you do e. and then
>> On 28/03/03 Benji Fisher did speaketh:
>>> It works for me. Can you give a more explicit recipe for
>>> reproducing the problem? What is your OS and version of vim?
>> *sigh* I can't get it to happen at the moment. I'll try it tomorrow
>> when I'm back at work, which is where it happened.
> :e. // select file1
> :e. // select file2
> :ls // the buffer list shows there is no alternate file
select a file, the alternate buffer is the file explorer buffer. If you
do :ls! you will see the file explorer buffer marked as the alternate
buffer, but also marked as 'unlisted', which is why it doesn't show up
under normal :ls .