Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: TEST ... was RE: HTML (was RE: unmapping?)

Expand Messages
  • Antoine J. Mechelynck
    Content-type: text/plain No mention of multipart/alternative I think you got it. Tony. ... From: Ondrejko, David To: Jay
    Message 1 of 2 , Aug 1, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      "Content-type: text/plain"
      No mention of multipart/alternative
      I think you got it.

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Ondrejko, David" <david.ondrejko@...>
      To: "'Jay Glanville'" <jayglanville@...>; "Ondrejko, David"
      <david.ondrejko@...>; "'Nagle, Adrian'" <anagle@...>; "'VIM
      Mailing List'" <vim@...>
      Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:20 PM
      Subject: TEST ... was RE: HTML (was RE: unmapping?)

      > > I'm not at work right now, but if I remember
      > > correctly, the way to solve this conundrum is
      > > to put the vim e-mail address as an entry in
      > > your personal address book, NOT your contacts
      > > list. In your personal address book, I believe
      > > that you can state that this person always gets
      > > sent stuff by plain text.
      > OK, done. I chose the 'Send Options' and said that I always wanted to
      > in plain text. Can somebody verify whether this email is now getting
      > through in plain text ONLY, or is it still HTML or mixed text/HTML?
      > > The major pain-in-the-a$$ part about this way
      > > of doing things is that whenever you reply to
      > > somebody at vim, you need to delete the vim
      > > address and replace it with the personal address
      > > book entry.
      > I can live with that if it solves this problem.
      > > At least, I think so. Again, I'm not working
      > > right now, so I can't guarantee anything I've
      > > just said.
      > >
      > > Let me know if this information helps you.
      > If this shows up on the list as plain text, then YES, that information
      > helped me!! :-)
      > Thanks for at least trying, even if that doesn't work for me. That's the
      > first new idea about this I've gotten in a while!
      > -- Davyd
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.