Re: Unexpected effect of "g:netrw_fastbrowse=2"
- Jean Johner wrote:
> Hi Chip!I'm combing through old email -- I no longer see this effect with netrw
> I had no answer for the above message.
> My version of netrw is v137l.
> With "let g:netrw_fastbrowse" absent, "let g:netrw_fastbrowse=0", "let
> g:netrw_fastbrowse=1", the netrw buffer is always marked unlisted (It
> appers with "u" when you type :ls!), so that it never shows when you
> use :bp. Which is in my opinion the expected behaviour.
> With "let g:netrw_fastbrowse=2", the netrw buffer is no longer
> unlisted after the second ":e." call, so that it shows when you
> use :bp. Can you reproduce that?
gvim -u simple.vimrc
shows the buffer to be unlisted. I then did a second listing with :e
DICT (happens to be directory I have) and it, too, was unlisted.
I think I'll mark this issue closed...
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.