Re: Multiple Substitutes for 'includeexpr'
- ZyX wrote:
> Reply to message «Multiple Substitutes for 'includeexpr'»,I think what AK meant was using a substitute as an argument to a
> sent 02:11:23 20 February 2011, Sunday
> by Roy Fulbright:
>> I tried adding a
>> second substitute to the assignment, separated by the vertical bar (|),
>> but this generates an error message while processing .vimrc.
> What do you mean by adding second substitute?
> set includeexpr=substitute(...)\|substitute(...)
> ? This won't work ...[snip]
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php