Ben Fritz wrote:
> On Aug 4, 6:24 am, Bram Moolenaar <B...@...> wrote:
> > I don't really want to build two versions of everything. It's already a
> > big hassle to build all the MS-Windows executables, adding another
> > variant will make it even more work.
> > I'll try building a version with MSVC 2008. Then we can verify this
> > also works on Windows 7 64 bit. I think it will.
> Fair enough. I think this sounds like the best plan.
> > I don't think we can support Windows 98/ME as well. It would require
> > using MSVC 2003 and I don't think those binaries will work on Windows 7.
> The source code will still work on old Windows though, correct? So
> worst case, someone on these systems will need to get ahold of a
> compatible Visual Studio or use MinGW or another compiler, and they
> can still have their Vim.
Sure. And there is a version for old Windows systems anyway. You do
need to use the "install.exe" instead of the self-installing executable.
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
6. You refuse to go to a vacation spot with no electricity and no phone lines.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- Bram@...
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php