48154RE: Keypresses being ignored - Solaris GTK
- Mar 3, 2004
>-----Original Message-----It will happen with anything one types. In fact if I type out the alphabet instead, this is what I get:
>From: Bram@... [mailto:Bram@...]
>Sent: 02 March 2004 13:13
>To: Fulton, William
>Subject: Re: Keypresses being ignored - Solaris GTK
>William Fulton wrote:
>> I am having some basic editing problems using gvim on Solaris which
>> seems to only occur with syntax highlighting turned on.
>> being ignored. It can be demonstrated by creating the following file
>> class LockoutCalculator
>> virtual ~LockoutCalculator();
>> Load it up using gvim -u NONE -U NONE vimproblem.h
>> Append an X (or anything else) to the class name then attempt to
>> comment out the word public... gvim commands:
>> :syn on [enter]
>> AX [esc]
>> The second forward slash does not appear, in fact any further editing
>> on this line requires most letters to be typed out twice for them to
>Strange, and I can't reproduce it. Especially because you
>first need to
>append something to the first line.
>Does this only happen when inserting "//"? That starts a
>be relevant. Does typing "/x" work?
Same occurs if I insert text at the beginning of the following line, but all the other lines are okay. I've tried very hard to find a pattern, but can't. It can occur with any of the insert type commands, like i or a and seems to affect only certain lines. I get the same problem if instead of appending X, I insert of append anything on the first two lines. This is a repeatable case, but it seemingly happens at random when editing.
>Did you try setting 'imdisable'? Just guessing... Hmm, "-multi_byte"I've got a corporate build and I couldn't get vim's configure to find gtk. Also it worked from another Solaris (5.6) box. Anyway I have switched from using Reflection as my X server (on Windows) to XFree86 with Cygwin and all is well now. I also tried Exceed and it gave the same problem. It is possibly an X server issue. Anyway I've bypassed the problem, thanks for all the suggestions.
>suggests that you don't use XIM, thus this would not be the problem.
>> Compiler: gcc 3.1
>Try building without optimizing. Some gcc versions have a broken
>> Built with: /sbcimp/run/pd/gtk/1.2.10
>Try without perl/python/tcl. They may cause another library to be used
Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
- << Previous post in topic