Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

37547Re: runaway vim processes

Expand Messages
  • Daniel Elstner
    Mar 3, 2003

      thanks a lot for the feedback. It turned out to be indeed helpful, see

      On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 09:55, Sean Richards wrote:
      > Daniel Elstner wrote:
      > > Darn. Oh well. Could you please mail me the ./configure arguments you
      > > used, the output of ./configure, the arguments used for compiling and
      > > linking (:version tells you), plus the output of 'ldd src/vim'? Hmm
      > > that's a lot, but nonetheless it'd be really helpful :)
      > As requested
      > [1] ./configure arguments
      > #!/bin/sh
      > ./configure --enable-gui=gtk --with-features=huge --with-compiledby=sean@darkstar --enable-pythoninterp --enable-rubyinterp --enable-cscope
      > [2] output from configure
      > loading cache auto/config.cache

      (It's probably not the issue but nonetheless a good idea to
      rm src/auto/config.cache before reconfiguring. Just in case.)


      > [3] output from :version
      > :version
      > VIM - Vi IMproved 6.1 (2002 Mar 24, compiled Mar 3 2003 21:28:11)
      > Included patches: 1-290


      > Compilation: gcc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFEAT_GUI_GTK -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2
      > -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O2 -I/usr/X
      > 11R6/include -I/usr/include/python2.2 -pthread -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.6/i686-linux

      That's fine, -pthread is there.

      > Linking: gcc -L/usr/X11R6/lib -rdynamic -L/usr/local/lib -o vim -L/usr/lib -L/usr/
      > X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -rdynamic -lgmodule -lglib -ldl -lXext -lXt -lncurses -lgpm -ld
      > l -L/usr/lib/python2.2/config -lpython2.2 -ldl -lpthread -lutil -Xlinker -export-dyna
      > mic /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.6/i686-linux/libruby.a -ldl -lcrypt -lm

      There's the bugger: -lpthread should not be there. Do

      rm src/vim
      rm src/src/auto/link.sed

      and try again. link.sh should print messages like "Trying to remove the
      pthread library..." and either "we don't need the pthread library!" or
      "we DO need the pthread library". Hopefully the first.

      With some luck you just had a stale link.sed in the tree, otherwise this
      will need further investigation. Please mail me your results in either
      case :)

    • Show all 16 messages in this topic