Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

134956Re: behaviour of d_

Expand Messages
  • Christian Brabandt
    Dec 10, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      On Mon, December 10, 2012 01:43, ping wrote:
      > any, overall, if d_ is same as dd, why bother the complexity? or are
      > there any extra value of using d_ that I missed?

      The functionality is there and probably also being demanded by POSIX.
      But in any case, it should work, no matter what some options are set to.

      regards,
      Christian

      --
      You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
      Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
      For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
    • Show all 13 messages in this topic