134956Re: behaviour of d_
- Dec 10, 2012On Mon, December 10, 2012 01:43, ping wrote:
> any, overall, if d_ is same as dd, why bother the complexity? or areThe functionality is there and probably also being demanded by POSIX.
> there any extra value of using d_ that I missed?
But in any case, it should work, no matter what some options are set to.
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>