134952Re: behaviour of d_
- Dec 9, 2012On 12/9/2012 9:44 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Christian Brabandt wrote:any, overall, if d_ is same as dd, why bother the complexity? or are
>> Hi Bram!
>> On Sa, 08 Dez 2012, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>>> Thanks. It's probably not difficult to add a test for this...
>> Yeah, I thought about this, after I sent the mail. Anyways, here is the
>> patch including a test.
> Thanks! I think it's a good habit to add a test if we fix something.
> It might break again.
there any extra value of using d_ that I missed?
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>