Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

134952Re: behaviour of d_

Expand Messages
  • ping
    Dec 9, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      On 12/9/2012 9:44 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
      > Christian Brabandt wrote:
      >
      >> Hi Bram!
      >>
      >> On Sa, 08 Dez 2012, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
      >>
      >>> Thanks. It's probably not difficult to add a test for this...
      >> Yeah, I thought about this, after I sent the mail. Anyways, here is the
      >> patch including a test.
      > Thanks! I think it's a good habit to add a test if we fix something.
      > It might break again.
      >
      >
      any, overall, if d_ is same as dd, why bother the complexity? or are
      there any extra value of using d_ that I missed?

      --
      You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
      Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
      For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
    • Show all 13 messages in this topic