Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

133095Re: vim window clears the terminal history

Expand Messages
  • joe M
    Sep 1, 2012
      On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Chris Jones <cjns1989@...> wrote:
      > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 09:14:14AM EDT, joe M wrote:
      >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Chris Jones <cjns1989@...> wrote:
      >> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:34:10PM EDT, joe M wrote:
      > [..]
      >> Hope the above helps. Please let me know if you need more information.
      > I'm not an expert in Vim or termcap/terminfo by a long way... :-)
      > I'm still not sure you are actually executing the code you compiled, but
      > I'll trust you on that. If you are confident the executables in /bin and
      > /usr/bin are the ones you compiled yourself, I nevertheless suggest you
      > run all your tests invoking them via their full path (/usr/bin/vim and
      > /bin/vi).
      > I also thought that a possible explanation of the inconsistent behavior
      > might be caused by the fact that ‘vi’ was using termcap and ‘vim’ was
      > using terminfo.. and that there might be escape sequence discrepancies
      > between the two on your system --something that I believe should not
      > happen, since a given terminal's capabilities remain the same and its
      > termcap and terminfo escape sequences should therefore be identical.
      > Another thing: _my understanding_ is that when both terminfo and termcap
      > are implemented, Vim chooses terminfo ‘automatically’ at configure time.
      > cf. :help startup-terminal.
      > And then there is the fact that I see ‘+terminfo’ in the output of both
      > the ‘vi --version’ and the ‘vim --version’ that you pasted in your
      > previous post. (cf. :h +terminfo).
      > Besides, ‘man 5 termcap’ has the following: ‘The termcap database is an
      > obsolete facility for describing the capabilities of character-cell
      > termi‐ nals and printers. It is retained only for capability with old
      > programs; new ones should use the ter‐ minfo(5) database and associated
      > libraries.’
      > Don't see any good reason Vim would use an ‘obsolete facility’ unless it
      > had to.
      > In no particular order, a few additional questions/remarks that might
      > help clarify:
      > 1. What distribution are you running?
      > 2. Did you run the default version of vi/vim before you compiled your
      > own from source?
      > 3. If so, are you positive you removed the prior version?
      > 4. Not suggesting a workaround, but did you try running the same test on
      > a different terminal.. & see what happens..? xterm is probably already
      > installed on your system¹, if not, you could also try good ole rxvt?
      > 5. Conversely, how about temporarily removing your compiled version and
      > installing your distro's default version and running a test. If the
      > problem goes away, this might suggest that the different behavior is
      > caused by one of the --enable-option that you specify at ./configure
      > time..?
      > 6. Would it make sense to generate both executables using the same
      > ./configure options.. check whether you still have the problem?
      > 7. Just in case, is there a TERMCAP environment variable exported to
      > your terminal session before you run vi/vim:
      > % env | grep TERMCAP
      > 8. As to builtin terminals.. I'm still running vim 7.2 and when I do
      > a ‘:set term=xxx’ there is no mention of urxvt or rxvt in my list of
      > builtin terminals. Is this also what happens with vim 7.3?
      > 9. Is termcap implemented on your system? On debian I apparently have it
      > as part of the libncurses5-dev package.
      > Naturally, the above are not really meant as questions, but rather,
      > stuff I would ask myself if I had the same problem and that might help
      > investigate².
      > CJ
      > ¹ Note that in the case of xterm, you can {en/dis}able the alternate
      > screen capability by holding down the CTRL key and middle-clicking:
      > This brings up a menu where you can check/uncheck ‘Enable alternate
      > screen switching’.
      > ² As to the disappearing lines, (the ‘seq 1000’ test), when I disable
      > alternate screen switching, I find that roughly one screen worth of
      > numbers are overwritten by the Vim screen that remains visible after
      > I exit. I have something like 91 lines on my terminal and when
      > I scroll back, the last number I see is 909.. immediately followed by
      > the last visible contents of the Vim session --i.e. if I was looking
      > at an empty buffer, I see a bash prompt, then vim's tabline, followed
      > by a number of empty lines and then the status line and lastly my bash
      > prompt at the bottom of the screen. I would imagine this is expected
      > behavior (?).
      > --
      > WHAT YOU SAY??
      > --
      > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
      > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
      > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

      Hello CJ,

      Thanks for the detailed response. I will go through the email and keep
      you posted if I notice anything different.

      Again, Thanks a lot for such a detailed response,

      You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
      Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
      For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
    • Show all 16 messages in this topic