822Re: clipboard for win9x
- Mar 13, 2003On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:34:11AM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > So, do we ever get CF_TEXT in 95? The recent Notepad problems seem toSince somebody confirmed this problem, I have code written to handle the
> > indicate that we do. Can someone confirm this by copying "Latín tëxt"
> > into Vim on a 95 box with "encoding" set to UTF-8? I expect that
> > you'll see "Lat<ed>n t<eb>xt". (You don't need this patch to test this,
> > just CVS, though I'm still looking for someone to test it in 95.)
other end of the conversion (converting CF_TEXT properly when pasting).
I'll post it (combined with the last patch, converting copying) once I
test it some more.
Unless you'd rather apply the current (more important) fix first. After
all, this problem has existed for a long time, so we don't necessarily
have to fix them together. Do you want to wait to finish the copying
fix and let that sit in CVS for a while before bothering with pasting?
> Didn't we have this discussion before? The CF_TEXT text canI don't recall. We might have settled on "maybe what we're doing is
> theoretically be any encoding. But it's probably the currently active
> codepage. Thus converting from that codepage to 'encoding' would work
> in most situations.
valid and maybe not, but UTF-8 pasting between Vims is more important
Anyway, as you said, since the stumbling block of cross-Vim pasting is gone
this doesn't matter now. We can deal with CF_TEXT in ANSI now without
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>