Re: vim60al: MacOS Idle TIme Patch
- Dany St-Amant wrote:
> using 'top' under MacOS X, I realized that Vim was chewing up to 80% ofThanks, I'll include it.
> the CPU when running idle in background. The following patch is solving
> this issue. now it take 0% when idle.
I notice that your attachment is in a strange format, I have to unpack it by
hand. Someone said he couldn't see the attachment at all.
Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how it remains so popular?
/// Bram Moolenaar -- Bram@... -- http://www.moolenaar.net \\\
((( Creator of Vim -- http://vim.sf.net -- ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim )))
\\\ Help me helping AIDS orphans in Uganda - http://iccf-holland.org ///
- on 30/06/01 4:48, Eugene Lee at eugene@... wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:31:19PM -0400, Dany St-Amant wrote:I put the patch at:
> : using 'top' under MacOS X, I realized that Vim was chewing up to 80% of
> : the CPU when running idle in background. The following patch is solving
> : this issue. now it take 0% when idle.
> Ummm, what patch? :-)