Re: MacVim 64/32 bit, Intel, 10.5+ to test
- 2009/10/7 Adam Mercer:
>Yeah, I tried this too...unfortunately this causes MacVim to no longer
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 16:09, björn wrote:
>> Yes! That is Sparkle complaining -- the version that I build against
>> doesn't have a 64bit binary. I am thinking that I'll be forced to
>> update to the Sparkle 1.5 beta...
> I dropped the 1.5b6 Sparkle.framework in and rebuilt, works without
> issue on 64bit SL.
build on Tiger because Xcode (on Tiger) doesn't know how to cope with
the x86_64 binary that's in Sparkle 1.5b6.
I then tried adding Sparkle as a git submodule, but that means one has
to poke around with "git submodule" just to build MacVim, which is
ridiculous since Sparkle should not be a required dependency. So,
then I went on to try to only build Sparkle if the submodule has been
initialized but as far as I can tell this is not possible in Xcode.
*sigh* So, I then went on to trying to make a script to manually
build Sparkle and this turned out to be rather complicated so I ran
out of time.
At the moment I'm not really sure what to do about Sparkle -- it is
the only thing holding me back from releasing a new snapshot and I
just don't have the time and energy to much around with trying to get
it to build in a nice way. For the moment I may end up removing it
from the repo and only add it to my local branch that I use to build
the snapshot. I don't particularly like this solution either, but its
better than nothing...
Suggestions or help with this problem would be appreciated.
You received this message from the "vim_mac" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php