2794Re: :split and scrolling doesn't work?
- Oct 12, 2004Bram, apologies for my ignorance. I did some reading
on OS X bundles, and finally figured out how to do what
I needed to do. I removed the 'set noscrollbind' commands
I added to ~/.gvimrc and ~/.vimrc and started Vim with:
/Applications/Vim.app/Contents/MacOS/Vim -g -c 'verbose set scrollbind?'
from the OS X terminal window.
Nothing is setting scrollbind, so, in this OS X build
at least, scrollbind is the default, rather than noscrollbind.
The configure script for building the app didn't reveal anything,
but I'm an autoconf neophyte also.
As a final complication, even if I add 'set noscrollbind' as the
very last line in ~/.gvimrc, it has no effect, even when Vim
indicates ~/.gvimrc is the last file sourced (according to
/Applications/Vim.app/Contents/MacOS/Vim -g -V).
Can anyone else here confirm the default scrollbind behavior
in the Vim 6.3 Mac OS X build?
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Daryl Basil Biberdorf wrote:
>>What is the best way to get the output of :verbose set scrollbind
>>with gvim under OS X?
> Eh, type the command?
>>My problem: I added set noscrollbind to .vimrc. It works under vim
>>when used in a terminal window. But when using gvim, it has no
>>effect at all. I added set noscrollbind to .gvimrc as well, which
>>seems redundant, but to no effect as well. Other settings in .gvimrc
>>and ,vimrc are getting picked up, so my scrollbind setting must be
>>getting overridden somewhere. Yes, this is just maddening. Even
>>more frustrating is that I'm still figuring OS X out. If this were
>>Linux, I'd already have it done. :)
> Very strange. Perhaps this gvim does not use your startup files? That
> would be strange. Use ":scriptnames" to see which script files have
> been used.
>>On another note, this list has been generating a lot of spam for me
>>in the last couple of days, mostly in the form of messages saying the
>>originate from people on the list (Bram in particular).
> E-mail address harvesters are very annoying. There does not seem to be
> a remedy against it, without disabling others from replying to you.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>