Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Blog Wikipedia Entry
- Den 30.04.2007 kl. 23:28 skrev Rupert <rupert@...>:
> It's brilliant, isn't it - the idiocy of an online resource which isWhich is total BS. Using tv, newspapers to track language use made sense
> edited by someone who says 'let's find a better source - blog sources
> are frowned on', in response to me linking to a Search page of this
> Group, which lists all the conversation around "What is vlogging?"
> So we have to find MSM sources for that?
back when those were the only records of daily use, and it still makes
sense in many cases today. However, for niche groups it makes little sense
to rely on mainstream sources for tracking language use - *especially*
since the members of the niche group publish so many words (spoken and
That's why Wikipedia-nazis who blindly follow policy without thinking are
bad for the world.
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
<URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
- On 5/3/07, Patrick Delongchamp <pdelongchamp@...> wrote:
>... does this mean "The Journal of Experimental Psychology" or "Science" or
> I know that sources that require subscriptions are heavily discouraged.
> I've never looked up student newspapers though. I'd say there's a good
> chance they're ok. You should check it out.
the "New England Journal of Medicine" are discouraged a reliable sources?
(Since they require a subscription?)
... just trying to understand
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]