77691Re: [videoblogging] Re: Fwd: Online Video Monetization Summit, May 5th in NYC
- May 4, 2010Joly MacFie: "...one can file [DMCA], and then the recipient can file a
counter-notice to get the file put back up, and one has no option except to
satrt proceedings. Thus it is not a very effective or economical way to take
Presuming you are referring to litigation by use of the term "proceedings,"
I agree in a general context.
However for one skilled in such matter filing suit in California (YouTube's
Judicial Jurisdiction pursuant to its TOS) a Limited Civil Case can be
prosecuted for just under $200, for say (as but one example) violation of
Cal. B&P §17200; the same applies in a broader sense for Federal cases under
17 USC §1203. (By de facto one agrees to a California jurisdiction when
Even with Attorney representation, prosecuting an IP Infringement case would
not necessarily entail great costs; considering the tactical advantage
California offers (in most Internet related actions).
Bottom-line nonetheless, is; messing with the wrong folk, like stupidity,
can be costly if not painfully significant. :D
Canine Adventures For Charity - sm
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>