74570Re: Video blogging history/evolution
- Apr 1, 2009Hi,
I totally agree with you. My words, that you cite is the attitude of my
paper's chief and even university, because when student writes a
scientific work, he must use, well, let's say the mainstream media and
(or) scientific literature . In this case, as I've been searching for
history events in video blogging, I haven't found any (except Jay
Dedman's) "trusty" sources, that I could use like: "one author says,
that video blogging started that way, that year, etc.", "second author
says, that video blogging started absolutely not like that, like said
first author" - that's called information sources analysis (of
literature/journal's/posts). In this case, I just cannot compare, cite
"forum posts" and put them in bibliography list, which is very
formal...For me, as student and citizen, it is no difference: is it
mainstream or not. In mainstream I can hear "the official side" of the
fact/topic, and in the blog I can find the "backstage" of the same
fact/topic, and the information I find on the blog, is up to me - to
trust or not (search for more info, etc.).
However, tomorrow, I'm going to meet my chief, and we will discuss about
that, and the results of "trustworthy and not sources" I will write
here...Thanks for posting !
--- In email@example.com, "~ FluxRostrum" <FluxRostrum@...>
> howdy Gintaras,
> what is sad to me (as someone who video Blogs documentary/news pieces)
> is this line of thought (which is not unique to you)
> that mainstream is trustworthy and independent is not.
> " it is sad, that sources, which are not mainstream,
> cannot be trusted..well, officially."
> If mainstream was trustworthy I would NEVER have been a video blogger.
> It was the main reason I choose to do this.
> You might want to be as skeptical of the mainstream as you are of
>they give information biased to benefit their corporations at the cost
> MAINSTREAM is controlled by the major corporations of the world and
of the truth and they will DENY this until death much like politicians.
> Independents Media sources are also biased but not toward the
> They are more openly biased, like an advocate.the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning,
> current project
> NOTICE: NOTHING HAS CHANGED. Due to Presidential Executive Orders,
warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative
oversight. You have no recourse nor protection.
> Powered By Outblaze
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>